Monday, May 17, 2010
It's my first foray into selling anything on eBay, so I'll probably get taken to the woodshed over the deal, but one guy's loss is another's gain I suppose. Yeah, I just checked and there have been no bids yet - but there are still 4 days and 18 hours left!
My plan "B" if they don't sell is to convince the groundwater district board that the groundwater conditions in Dublin, Ohio must be checked out to insure their sustainability. Yeah, that should work!
Thursday, May 6, 2010
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
In trying to replace WRCP with some other conservation program funded some other way, several approaches were started through the Legislative and Rule making process by independent entities. What came out of all these efforts was a new statute that makes it a matter of law that non-use by any water right in areas closed to new development (as long as the well is maintained) is "due and sufficient cause" for non-use and the water right cannot be abandoned. On the surface this sounds innocuous enough - and certainly in the favor of water right owners who don't want to pump the right, but want to retain it. Remember, a water right in Kansas is a real property right (in perpetuity) to the use of the state's water so long as the conditions of the water right are adhered to.
However, we've just created a situation, in closed areas, where no water right will ever get abandoned except by voluntary action by the owner - as long as the well is maintained. Not so much a problem today, but eventually these non-used rights will be involved in any management solutions applied to the area. If water right reductions are ever made, those who have been using the water all along will have to cut deeper in order to equitably share the pain with those who haven't been using the water at all, and may never do so again. I suspect there will be active discussions at that time. Of course, maybe water markets were invented for this exact reason. It's all a matter of perspective.